Well, I do see Killat Serrada's point. Up to a time, I thought that FMA was a term used only to refer to arnis, eskrima, kali (<--I know, I know, but let's not get into that now), garrote, olisi, and so on- basically all the stickfighting/bladefighting styles and systems that trace their roots to the Philippines.
This is not to discount sikaran, buno't dumog, boltong,
at iba pa as being other martial arts of Pinoy origin, because to me, it is obvious that they are. I just thought that the term FMA was specifically coined to counter the confusion regarding the many terms (arnis, eskrima, olisi, etc.) that refer to the more or less similar Filipino stick/blade fighting arts. Different styles and systems, but basically the similar paradigm of weapos first, largo media corto, trapping, flow, striking angles, and so on.
Now, if FMA apparently has the bigger definition- all martial arts/combat arts/combat sports/you-get-what-I-mean originating from the Philippines, then maybe we need a different term to encompass just our various arnis, eskrima, kali, olisi, garrote, etc. styles. Filipino weapon fighting?
---
On another note: is sikaran a generic Filipino term for kicking? I have been under the impression that sikaran specifically refers only to the kicking sport that originated from Baras, Rizal (and I do say sport because I think the farmers who practice this do so just to pass the time and test their mettle, and not to prepare for war or anything like that). But now, I've been hearing that sikaran is a subset within the art of kali, consisting of low line kicking?
I mean, to me its alright to include kicking in your schools curriculum. I just draw the line at taking terms such as sikaran out of context. What's next, teach a few flowery disarms and then call it the eskrima subsystem of boltong?